linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: da9150: Add support for Fuel-Gauge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2E89032DDAA8B9408CB92943514A0337AB555F28@SW-EX-MBX01.diasemi.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:24:33 +0000
From:	"Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
	"Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
CC:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	"Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: da9150: Add support for Fuel-Gauge

On June 19, 2015 17:48, Paul Bolle wrote:

> On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 17:06 +0100, Adam Thomson wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/da9150/fg.h
> 
> > +/*
> > + * Function template to provide battery temperature. Should provide
> > + * 0.1 degrees C resolution return values.
> > + */
> > +typedef int (*da9150_read_temp_t)(void *context);
> > +
> > +/* Register temp callback function */
> > +void da9150_fg_register_temp_cb(struct power_supply *psy,
> da9150_read_temp_t cb,
> > +				void *cb_context);
> 
> The pedant in me noticed that this function is actually added in 3/4. So
> this chunk might be moved to 3/4, if you like to entertain pedantry like
> that, that is. (But see my remark on 3/4 too.)

This is true, but as the header is part of MFD, I included it as part of that
patch as I thought this made more sense. I guess Lee will comment as to whether
that was correct or not. :)