[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1434972306-20043-1-git-send-email-umesh.t@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:55:06 +0530
From: Umesh Tiwari <umesh.t@...sung.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gupta.namit@...sung.com, pankaj.m@...sung.com,
Umesh Tiwari <umesh.t@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ftrace: correct the counter increment for trace_buffer data
In ftrace_dump, for disabling buffer, iter.tr->trace_buffer.data is used.
But for enabling, iter.trace_buffer->data is used.
Even though, both point to same buffer, for readability, same convention
should be used.
Signed-off-by: Umesh Tiwari <umesh.t@...sung.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 62c6506..e6dc9c3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -6698,7 +6698,7 @@ void ftrace_dump(enum ftrace_dump_mode oops_dump_mode)
trace_init_global_iter(&iter);
for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
- atomic_inc(&per_cpu_ptr(iter.tr->trace_buffer.data, cpu)->disabled);
+ atomic_inc(&per_cpu_ptr(iter.trace_buffer->data, cpu)->disabled);
}
old_userobj = trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_SYM_USEROBJ;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists