[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87616fluvt.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:45:10 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] futex: eliminate cache miss from futex_hash()
On Mon, Jun 22 2015, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:16:18PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> +static struct {
>> + struct futex_hash_bucket *queues;
>> + unsigned long hashsize;
>> +} __futex_data __read_mostly __aligned(16);
>
> Does: __aligned(sizeof(__futex_data)), work?
>
Unfortunately not:
kernel/futex.c:265:30: error: ‘__futex_data’ undeclared here (not in a function)
kernel/futex.c:265:1: error: requested alignment is not an integer constant
> Because 16 might waste 8 bytes on 32bit.
Yeah, wasting >= 48 bytes was the reason I didn't make it
____cacheline_aligned. If 8 bytes is also too much, I suppose one could
just give the struct a tag and then use sizeof(struct futex_data).
Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists