[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB4PR02MB272B2804219ED0AD76BA1B2D6A10@DB4PR02MB272.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:52:48 +0000
From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"vgupta@...opsys.com" <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@...hip.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
Tal Zilcer <talz@...hip.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] NET: Add ezchip ethernet driver
From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 7:22 PM
> This builds with several warnings and also doesn't compile.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c: In function ‘nps_enet_read_rx_fifo’:
> drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c:43:24: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c:43:24: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c: In function ‘nps_enet_send_frame’:
> drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c:366:24: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c:366:24: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
Once I start to use newer GCC (5.1.1) I get those as well. My previous GCC (4.8) did not report them.
> drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c: In function ‘nps_enet_poll_controller’:
> drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c:535:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘nps_enet_board_irq_handler’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
My configuration lacked the CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER this is why I missed this typo caused due to renaming. I added CONFIG_NETCONSOLE to my configuration, now GCC report this error as well.
> I do not even see where npe_enet_board_irq_handler could possible be defined.
It was renamed: nps_enet_board_irq_handler -> nps_enet_irq_handler (I removed the _board).
> It is quite infuriating to receive a patch like this which is claimed to be complete and ready to be applied to my tree, yet it is very clearly not.
My sincerest apologies for any problem I have made. I will send another version that will be worth applying to your tree.
Noam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists