[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150622163333.GC20244@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:33:33 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] notifiers: Assert that RCU is watching in
notify_die
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 09:26:13AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> notify_die is misnamed and has little to do with death. It's really
> just notifying about an exception, and we might end up oopsing,
> sending a signal, or neither.
But if we oops and wedge solid afterwards, it might happen that only the
first splat comes out on the console, no? And that will be the lockdep
splat which would be useless for debugging the actual problem...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists