[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150622175541.GB2965@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:55:41 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
dm-devel@...hat.com, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:5 when removing LV on removed device
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 01:52:55PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 01:46:48PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Subject: fs/block_dev.c: Warn on inode writeback failure instead of WARN_ON()
> >
> > If a block device is hot removed and later last reference to devices
> > is put, we try to writeback the dirty inode. But device is gone and
> > that writeback fails.
> >
> > Currently we do a WARN_ON() which does not seem to be the right thing.
> > Convert it to a ratelimited kernel warning.
>
> Yeah, looks good to me. Just one nit.
>
> ...
> > + if (write_inode_now(inode, true)) {
> > + char name[BDEVNAME_SIZE] = "";
> > + pr_warn_ratelimited("VFS: Dirty inode writeback failed for block device %s.\n", bdevname(bdev, name));
>
> This wasn't reported before either but maybe we wanna report the errno
> too? Also, don't we usually break the line for parameters?
>
> pr_..("long format string going over 80 col...\n",
> param0, param1, ...);
Hi Tejun,
Will do. I have been doing some go programming in docker recently and this
has been a side effect of that. :-) Will format it correctly.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists