[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150622010138.GQ11147@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 03:01:38 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [x86/mm/pat, drivers/media/ivtv] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at
drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtvfb.c:1270 ivtvfb_init()
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:23:48PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Nope, well the driver requires huge amounts of work to work with PAT,
> > that work will likely never be done, so hence the warning. Its our
> > compromise as only 2 drivers will live on Linux like this and they are
> > both old and rare.
>
> Hmm, so wasn't the possibility discussed to fail loading
It will fail load.
> instead and
> issue a single-line pr_warn() when PAT is enabled?
During review no one opposed the idea of having the warn
as its a load thing, not a compile thing, and a user
that does not get their driver loaded should know why,
otherwise its not clear.
> Those big WARN() splats will only confuse people...
We can certainly replace the WARN() with pr_warn(), I don't see
how its confusing though as its a run time real issue. Either
way whatever you recommend is fine by me.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists