linux-kernel - Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 7/8] cpufreq: st: Provide runtime initialised driver for ST's platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55890B4C.5000406@st.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:31:24 +0200
From:	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...inux.com>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 7/8] cpufreq: st: Provide runtime initialised
 driver for ST's platforms



On 06/23/2015 09:16 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> Thanks for your timely review Viresh.
>
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 22-06-15, 16:43, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> +config ARM_ST_CPUFREQ
>>> +	bool "ST CPUFreq support"
>> Isn't using ST just too generic? There are multiple SoCs ST has been
>> involved with, I have worked on a completely different series.
>> Probably a more relative string is required here, like stih407 ?
> This is ST's only CPUFreq implementation and is pretty board
> agnostic.  This particular driver only currently supports the STiH407
> family, but internally it supports some others too.  I'll have a chat
> and see if we can make it more specific somehow.
I think you can use STI instead.

Regards,
Maxime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/