linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: STi: STiH407: Provide a node for CPUFreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:27:37 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	rob.herring@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...inux.com,
	rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ajitpal.singh@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: STi: STiH407: Provide a node for CPUFreq

On 23-06-15, 08:10, Lee Jones wrote:
> > These virtual nodes aren't allowed in DT and you have added them
> > before the bindings patch :).
> 
> This isn't a virtual node, but you bring up a good point.

Hmm, wrong choice of words. Sorry.. 

So, its a node for a virtual device :). The device is CPU and it
already has a node for itself. And so such nodes were discouraged
earlier by DT maintainers.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/