linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150623090016.GL16776@linux>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:30:16 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	robh@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...inux.com,
	rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ajitpal.singh@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq
 implementation

On 23-06-15, 09:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> Do you always write your documentation before implementing a
> feature?
> 
> Surely it goes;
>   Requirements Gathering
>   Plan and Prepare
>   Implement
>   Test
>   Document
>   Deliver
> 
> ;)

DT bindings aren't just simple documentation of how things are
working. I do things in the way you wrote earlier though :)

> That's not what it looks like to me:
> 
> git grep -C20 "compatible.*cpufreq" -- arch

Yeah, that's wrong. They got in much earlier and the bindings weren't
well thought through.

But they are discouraged today ..

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/