[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33380936.3jDOACMRCz@tachyon.chronox.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:01:14 +0200
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Peter Zijlstra
<public-peterz-wegcikhe2lqwvfeawa7xhq@...ne.gmane.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: #pragma GCC warnings (was: Re: [PATCH] crypto: drbg - use pragmas for disabling optimization)
Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2015, 17:21:06 schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:17:23AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > I get that too with m68k-linux-gcc-4.6.3 and m68k-linux-gcc-4.9.0.
> >
> > With m68k-linux-gnu-gcc-4.1, which is still my default cross-compiler due
> > to the good unused warning reporting, I get:
> >
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:235: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC push_options
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:236: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC optimize
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:266: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC pop_options
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:295: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC push_options
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:296: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC optimize
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:336: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC pop_options
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:385: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC push_options
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:386: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC optimize
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:416: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC pop_options
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:517: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC push_options
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:518: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC optimize
> > crypto/jitterentropy.c:580: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC pop_options
>
> Stephan, could you look into moving the relevant functions into
> its own file which can then be compiled with -O0? Obviously any
> dependency on kernel header files would have to be hidden using
> functions outside of this file.
I have separated all so far. However, there are two items left where I am not
sure about:
- asm/types.h: I need __u64
- linux/bitops.h: I need rol64
Can I safely include both header files or do I have to hide them too. If yes,
how would I do that in a way that is satisfactory?
Thanks.
--
Ciao
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists