[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150623135943.GB9454@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:59:43 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 23
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 05:53:58AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Stephen could you please drop the kdbus tree?
What? No, that's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
> There was some significant work that was identified last merge window
> that has not yet been done, and who knows when it will be done.
> Certainly the recent sd-bus API announcement strongly suggests that
> there are no plans to perform such work.
>
> Having the kdbus tree in linux-next with the implicit suggestion that a
> pull request will be sent to Linus this merge window before the problems
> are addressed and we will have to repeat the mess from last merge window
> keeps me up at night.
Code sitting in linux-next keeps you awake? I think you need to
exercise more so that you can sleep better :)
> So to avoid the appearance that the kdbus folks are continuing to
> ignoring feedback can we please keep the kdbus tree out of linux-next
> until it is ready to be merged?
We are not ignoring _constructive_ feedback, please realize the
difference.
First Andy does a preemptive NAK of a pull request that was never sent,
and now you want to kick it out of linux-next for no valid reason. If I
was an insecure person, I'd think that there are some people in the
kernel community who don't like me at the moment.
This is just getting ridiculous.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists