[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558973A7.6010407@bmw-carit.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:56:39 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: <oleg@...hat.com>, <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <tj@...nel.org>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<der.herr@...r.at>, <dave@...olabs.net>, <riel@...hat.com>,
<viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/13] percpu rwsem -v2
On 06/23/2015 04:34 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:35:24AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> flock01
>> mean variance sigma max min
>> 4.1.0 11.7075 816.3341 28.5716 125.6552 0.0021
>> 4.1.0+percpu-rwsem 11.4614 760.1345 27.5705 132.5030 0.0026
>> tip 6.8390 329.3037 18.1467 81.0373 0.0021
>> tip+percpu-rwsem 10.0870 546.7435 23.3825 106.2396 0.0026
>
>> posix01
>> mean variance sigma max min
>> 4.1.0 121.9020 27882.5260 166.9806 603.5509 0.0063
>> 4.1.0+percpu-rwsem 185.3981 38474.3836 196.1489 580.6532 0.0073
>> tip 129.2736 23752.7122 154.1191 474.0604 0.0063
>> tip+percpu-rwsem 142.6474 24732.1571 157.2646 468.7478 0.0072
>
> Both these tests are incredibly unstable for me (as well as for you it
> appears). Variance is through the roof on them.
Since on my test machine not all 4 socket have inter connection, I pinned the
tests down to one socket to see if that reduces the variance.
Expect flock01 and posix01 show now really low variances (3 runs):
[...]
flock02
mean variance sigma max min
tip-1 11.8994 0.5874 0.7664 13.2022 8.6324
tip-2 11.7394 0.5252 0.7247 13.2540 9.7513
tip-3 11.8155 0.5288 0.7272 13.2700 9.9480
tip+percpu-rswem-1 15.3601 0.8981 0.9477 16.8116 12.6910
tip+percpu-rswem-2 15.2558 0.8442 0.9188 17.0199 12.9586
tip+percpu-rswem-3 15.5297 0.6386 0.7991 17.4392 12.7992
lease01
mean variance sigma max min
tip-1 0.3424 0.0001 0.0110 0.3644 0.3088
tip-2 0.3627 0.0003 0.0185 0.4140 0.3312
tip-3 0.3446 0.0002 0.0125 0.3851 0.3155
tip+percpu-rswem-1 0.3464 0.0001 0.0116 0.3781 0.3113
tip+percpu-rswem-2 0.3597 0.0003 0.0162 0.3978 0.3250
tip+percpu-rswem-3 0.3513 0.0002 0.0151 0.3933 0.3122
[...]
So with this setup we can start to compare the numbers.
> I get runtimes like:
>
> root@...-ex:/usr/local/src/lockperf# ./flock01 -n 240 -l 32 /tmp/a
> 0.266157011
> root@...-ex:/usr/local/src/lockperf# ./flock01 -n 240 -l 32 /tmp/a
> 139.303399960
Same here:
flock01
mean variance sigma max min
tip-1 242.6147 3632.6201 60.2712 313.3081 86.3743
tip-2 233.1934 3850.1995 62.0500 318.2716 101.2738
tip-3 223.0392 3944.5220 62.8054 318.1932 110.8155
tip+percpu-rswem-1 276.5913 2145.0510 46.3147 317.5385 156.1318
tip+percpu-rswem-2 270.7089 2735.7635 52.3045 318.9418 154.5902
tip+percpu-rswem-3 267.8207 3028.3557 55.0305 320.2987 150.9659
posix01
mean variance sigma max min
tip-1 18.8729 151.2810 12.2996 37.3563 0.0060
tip-2 17.6894 140.9982 11.8743 37.2080 0.0060
tip-3 18.7785 145.1217 12.0466 35.5001 0.0060
tip+percpu-rswem-1 18.9970 163.8856 12.8018 35.8795 0.0069
tip+percpu-rswem-2 18.9594 147.3197 12.1375 35.4404 0.0069
tip+percpu-rswem-3 18.8366 126.5831 11.2509 35.9014 0.0069
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists