[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gfdfJF_-wK26wjxY=ai+QoUtS3ZpLT4ORX-P_wPQiA-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:20:51 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/32] ACPICA: Hardware: Enable 64-bit firmware waking
vector for selected FACS.
Hi Lv,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com> wrote:
> ACPICA commit 7aa598d711644ab0de5f70ad88f1e2de253115e4
>
> The root cause of the reported bug might be one of the followings:
> 1. BIOS may favor the 64-bit firmware waking vector address when the
> version of the FACS is greater than 0 and Linux currently only supports
> resuming from the real mode, so the 64-bit firmware waking vector has
> never been set and might be invalid to BIOS while the commit enables
> higher version FACS.
> 2. BIOS may favor the FACS reported via the "FIRMWARE_CTRL" field in the
> FADT while the commit doesn't set the firmware waking vector address of
Can you please tell me which commit this is about?
> the FACS reported by "FIRMWARE_CTRL", it only sets the firware waking
> vector address of the FACS reported by "X_FIRMWARE_CTRL".
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists