linux-kernel - "[-next] ARM: Fix build if CLKDEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:37:24 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: "[-next] ARM: Fix build if CLKDEV_LOOKUP is not configured"

If you'd like me to apply a patch, it's no good discussing it in a
place where I have no knowledge of, and then suggesting that I
should apply it.

Paul Gortmaker brought your patch to my attention, and said that it
had been breaking MIPS for a week, and asked whether I had any
knowledge of it.  I did not.

Given that the patch was created on 14th June, and it's now some 9
days later, I have to ask what's going on here?  Has someone else
queued it up?  Is someone intending to apply it during the merge
window once the stuff which causes the breakage in my tree has
landed?  Are you still expecting me to somehow pick up a patch that
I had no knowledge of, for a breakage that I had no knowledge of?

Basically, what are you expecting to happen with this patch?

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/