linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] Drivers: hv: vmbus: add special kexec handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:28:36 +0200
From:	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:	Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
Cc:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	apw@...onical.com, jasowang@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] Drivers: hv: vmbus: add special kexec handler

Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 04, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
>>  #include <linux/efi.h>
>>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>  #include <linux/irq.h>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
>> +#include <linux/kexec.h>
>> +#endif
>
> Is this #ifdef required?
>

No, it's not, but other parts of the same patch do (e.g. there is no
kexec_in_progress without CONFIG_KEXEC). We can probably omit #ifdef
here but I'm not sure it makes sense.

-- 
  Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/