[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150623163624.GA24874@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:36:24 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, der.herr@...r.at, dave@...olabs.net,
riel@...hat.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 12/13] stop_machine: Remove lglock
On 06/23, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> {
...
> - while (try_stop_cpus(cma ? cm : cpu_online_mask,
> - synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop,
> - NULL) == -EAGAIN) {
> - put_online_cpus();
> - atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_tryfail);
> -
> - /* Check to see if someone else did our work for us. */
> - s = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done);
> - if (ULONG_CMP_GE((ulong)s, (ulong)firstsnap)) {
> - /* ensure test happens before caller kfree */
> - smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
> - atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_workdone1);
> - free_cpumask_var(cm);
> - return;
> - }
...
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
...
> + stop_one_cpu(cpu, synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop, NULL);
I too thought about something like this change ;)
Not sure I read this patch correctly, but it seems that then you can
remove all rsp->expedited_* members/code ?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists