lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:24:01 -0700
From:	Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
To:	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Documentation/scsi: Documentation about scsi_cmnd lifecycle

Hello James,

I haven't heard any feedback on this patch, so I was wondering if this
documentation patch is something you're considering to review?

Many thanks in advance,

Rajat

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com> wrote:
> Add documentation to describe the various scenarios that the scsi_cmnd
> may go through in its life time in the mid level driver - aborts,
> failures, retries, error handling etc. The documentation has lots of
> details including examples.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
> ---
> Hello James / linux-scsi,
>
> Resending the patch since it couldn't get any attention in a month. I'd
> appreciate if you could please review it and provide your valuable feedback.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rajat
>
>
>  Documentation/scsi/life_of_a_scsi_cmnd.txt | 667 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 667 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/scsi/life_of_a_scsi_cmnd.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/scsi/life_of_a_scsi_cmnd.txt b/Documentation/scsi/life_of_a_scsi_cmnd.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b09b2a2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/scsi/life_of_a_scsi_cmnd.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,667 @@
> +                 ==================================
> +                 Life of a SCSI Command (scsi_cmnd)
> +                 ==================================
> +
> +              Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com> on 12-May-2015
> +
> +(This document roughly matches the Linux kernel 4.0)
> +
> +This documents describes the various phases of a SCSI command (struct scsi_cmnd)
> +lifecycle, as it flows though different parts of the SCSI mid level driver. It
> +describes under what conditions and how a scsi_cmnd may be aborted, or retried,
> +or scheduled for error handling, and how is it recovered, and in general how a
> +block request is handled by the SCSI mid level driver. It goes into detail about
> +what functions get called and the purpose for each one of them etc.
> +
> +To help explain with an example, it takes example of a scsi_cmnd that goes
> +through it all - timeout, abort, error handling, retry (also results in
> +CHECK_CONDITION and gets sense info). The last section traces the path taken by
> +this example scsi_cmnd in its lifetime.
> +
> +TABLE OF CONTENTS
> +
> +[1] Lifecycle of a scsi_cmnd
> +[2] How does a scsi_cmnd get queued to the LLD for processing?
> +[3] How does a scsi_cmnd complete?
> +    [3.1] Command completing via scsi_softirq_done()
> +    [3.2] Command completing via scsi_times_out()$
> +[4] SCSI Error Handling
> +    [4.1] How did we Get here?
> +    [4.2] When does Error Handling actually run?
> +    [4.3] SCSI Error Handler thread
> +[5] SCSI Commands can be "hijacked"
> +[6] SCSI Command Aborts
> +    [6.1] When would mid level try to abort a command?
> +    [6.2] How SCSI command abort works?
> +    [6.3] Aborts can fail too
> +[7] SCSI command Retries
> +    [7.1] When would mid level retry a command?
> +    [7.2] Eligibility criteria for Retry
> +[8] Example: Following a scsi_cmnd (that results in CHECK_CONDITION)
> +    [8.1] High level view of path taken by example scsi_cmnd
> +    [8.2] Actual Path taken
> +[9] References
> +
> +1. Lifecycle of a scsi_cmnd
> +   ========================
> +   SCSI Mid level interfaces with the block layer just like any other block
> +   driver. For each block device that SCSI ML adds to the system, it indicates
> +   a bunch of functions to serve the corresponding request queue.
> +
> +   The following functions are relevant to the scsi_cmnd in its lifetime. Note
> +   that depending on the situations, it may not go thourgh some of these
> +   stages, or may have to go through some stages multiple times.
> +
> +   scsi_prep_fn()
> +     is called by the blocklayer to prepare the request. This
> +     function actually allocates a new scsi_cmnd for the request (from
> +     scsi_host->cmd_pool) and sets it up. This is where a scsi_smnd is "born".
> +     Note, a new scsi_cmnd is allocated only if the blk req did not already have
> +     one associated with it (req->special != NULL). A req may already have a
> +     scsi_cmnd if the req was tried by SCSI earlier, and it resulted in a
> +     decision to retry later (and hence req was put back on the queue).
> +
> +   scsi_request_fn()
> +     is the actual function to serve the request queue. It basically checks
> +     whether the host is ready for new commands, and if so, it submits it to the
> +     LLD:
> +     scsi_request_fn()
> +       ->scsi_dispatch_cmd()
> +           ->hostt->queue_command()
> +     In case a scsi_cmnd could not be queued to LLD for some reason, the req
> +     is put back on the original request queue (for retry later).
> +
> +   scsi_softirq_done()
> +     is the handler that gets called once the LLD indicates command completed.
> +     scsi_done()
> +       ->blk_complete_request()
> +           ->causes softirq
> +               ->blk_done_softirq()
> +                   ->scsi_softirq_done()
> +     The most important goal of this function is to determine the course of
> +     further action for this req (based on the scsi_cmnd->result and sense data
> +     if present), and take that course. The options could be to finish off the
> +     request to block layer, requeue it to block layer, or schedule it for error
> +     handling (if that is deemed necessary). This is discussed in much detail
> +     later.
> +
> +   scsi_times_out()
> +     is the function that gets called if the LLD does not respond with the
> +     result of a scsi_cmnd for a long time, and a time out happens. It tries
> +     to see if the situation can be fixed by LLD timeout handlers (if available)
> +     or aborting the commands. If not, it schedules the commands for EH
> +     (discussed at length later).
> +
> +   scsi_unprep_fn()
> +     is the function that gets called to unprepare the request. It is supposed
> +     to undo whatever scsi_prep_fn() does.
> +
> +2. How does a scsi_cmnd get queued to the LLD for processing?
> +   ==========================================================
> +   The submission part is very simple. Once the scsi_request_fn() gets called
> +   for a block request and it picks up a new block request via
> +   blk_peek_request(), the scsi_cmnd has already been setup and is ready to be
> +   sent to the LLD:
> +    scsi_request_fn()
> +        ->scsi_dispatch_cmd()
> +              ->hostt->queue_command()
> +
> +3. How does a scsi_cmnd complete?
> +   ==============================
> +   Once a scsi_cmnd is submitted to the LLD, there are only 2 ways it can get
> +   completed:
> +
> +   a. Either the LLD responds in time.
> +      (i.e. resulting in scsi_softirq_done() for the command)
> +
> +   b. Or, the LLD does not respond in time and a timeout out occurred
> +      (i.e. resulting in scsi_times_out() for the command)
> +
> +   We discuss both these cases below.
> +
> +   Note 1: There may be scsi_cmnd(s) that are re-tried. But completion of a
> +      re-tried scsi_cmnd is not any different than the completion of a new
> +      scsi_cmnd. Thus irrespective of retries, the scsi_cmnds will always end up
> +      in using one of the above 2 scenarios.
> +
> +   Note 2: A scsi_cmnd may be "highjacked" during error handling in
> +      scsi_send_eh_cmnd(), to send one of the EH commands (TUR / STU /
> +      REQUEST_SENSE). However, the completion of these EH commands does not land up
> +      in the above two scenarios. This is the only exception. Once the scsi_cmnd is
> +      "un-hijacked", the result of this original scsi_cmnd will still go through
> +      the same 2 scenarios.
> +
> +3.1 Command completing via scsi_softirq_done()
> +    ==========================================
> +    This is the case when the LLD responded in time i.e. completed the command.
> +    Note that here "completed" does not mean that the command was successfully
> +    completed. In fact it could have been the case, that the SCSI host hardware
> +    may have failed without even accepting the command. However, the fact that
> +    scsi_softir_done() was called, indicates that there is a "result" available
> +    in a timely fashion. And we'll have to examine this result in order to
> +    decide the next course of action.
> +
> +    scsi_softirq_done()
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_decide_disposition()
> +    |      Takes a look at the scsi_cmnd->result and sense data to determine
> +    |      what is the best course of action to take. While reading this
> +    |      function code, one should not confuse SUCCESS as meaning the command
> +    |      was successful, or FAILED to mean the command failed etc. The return
> +    |      value of this function merely indicates the course of action to take
> +    |
> +    +---> case SUCCESS:
> +    |      (Finish off the command to block layer. For e.g, the device may be
> +    |      offline, and hence complete the command - the block layer may retry
> +    |      on its own later, but that doesn't concern the SCSI ML)
> +    |      |
> +    |      +---> scsi_finish_command()
> +    |            |
> +    |            +---> scsi_io_completion() (*see note below)
> +    |                  |
> +    |                  +---> blk_finish_request()
> +    |
> +    +---> case RETRY/ADD_TO_MLQUEUE:
> +    |     (Requeue the command to request queue. For e.g. the device HW was
> +    |      busy, and thus SCSI ML knows that retrying may help)
> +    |      |
> +    |      +---> scsi_queue_insert()
> +    |            |
> +    |            +---> blk_requeue_request()
> +    |
> +    +---> case FAILED/default:
> +          (Schedule the scsi_cmnd for EH. For e.g. there was a bus error that
> +          might need bus reset. Or we got CHECK_CONDITION and we need to issue
> +          REQ_SENSE to get more info about the failure. etc)
> +          |
> +          +---> scsi_eh_scmd_add()
> +                Add scsi_cmnd to the host EH queue
> +                    scsi_eh_wakeup()
> +
> +    Note 3:
> +       The scsi_io_completion() has a secondary logic similar to
> +       scsi_decide_disposition() in that it also looks at result and sense data
> +       and figures out what to do with request. It makes similar choices on the
> +       course of action to take. There is a special case in this function that
> +       involves "unprepping" a scsi_cmnd before requeuing it, and we'll discuss
> +       it in sections below.
> +
> +3.2 Command completing via scsi_times_out()
> +    =======================================
> +    This happens when the LLD does not repond in time, the block layer times
> +    out, and as a result calls the timeout function for the request queue for
> +    the SCSI device in question.
> +
> +    scsi_times_out()
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_transport_template->eh_timed_out() - Successful? If not...
> +    |     (Gives transportt a chance to deal with it)
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_host_template->eh_timed_out() - Successful? If not...
> +    |     (Gives hostt a chance to deal with it)
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_abort_command() - Successful? If not...
> +    |     (Schedule an ABORT of the scsi_cmnd. The abort handler will also
> +    |      requeue it if needed)
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_eh_scmd_add()
> +          (Schedule the scsi_cmnd for EH. This'll definitely work. Because if it
> +           doesn't work, the EH handler will mark the device as offline, which
> +           counts as a good fix :-))
> +
> +4. SCSI Error Handling
> +   ===================
> +
> +   SCSI Error handling should be thought of the action the mid level decides to
> +   take when it knows that merely retrying a request may not help, and it needs
> +   to do something else (possibly disruptive) in order to fix the issue. For
> +   e.g. a stalled host may require a host reset, and only after that a retry of
> +   the request may complete.
> +
> +   Note 4:
> +      (Random thoughts): Contrast the "Error Handling" with "Retries". A Retry
> +      is a normal thing to do, when the mid level believes that it has seen an
> +      error which is transient in nature, and will go away on its own without
> +      explicitly doing anything. Thus a retry of a request again makes sense in
> +      this case. (On the other hand a cmnd is scheduled for EH, when it knows
> +      that it needs to do "something" before a retrying a cmnd can give good
> +      results).
> +
> +   Note 5:
> +      The SCSI mid level maintains a (per-host) list of all the scsi_cmnd(s)
> +      that have been scheduled for EH at that host using scsi_host->eh_cmd_q.
> +      This is the list that gets processed by the EH thread, when it runs.
> +
> +4.1 How did we Get here?
> +    --------------------
> +
> +    A scsi_cmnd could be marked for EH in the following cases:
> +
> +    * The command "error completed" i.e. scsi_decide_disposition() returned
> +      FAILED or something that indicates a failure that requires some sort of
> +      error recovery. E.g. device hardware failed, or we have a CHECK_CONDITION.
> +      scsi_softirq_done()
> +        ->scsi_decide_disposition = FAILED
> +            ->scsi_eh_scmd_add()
> +
> +    * A scsi_cmnd timed out, and attempt to abort it fails.
> +      scsi_times_out()
> +        ->scsi_abort_command() != SUCCESS
> +            ->scsi_eh_scmd_add()
> +
> +4.2 When does Error Handling actually run?
> +    -------------------------------------
> +
> +    A SCSI error handler thread is scheduled whenever there is a scsi_smnd that
> +    is marked for EH (inserted in the Scsi_Host->eh_cmd_q). Once a scsi_cmnd is
> +    marked for EH, the ML does not accept any more scsi_cmnds for that
> +    particular Scsi_Host. However, the EH thread does not actually run until all
> +    the pending IOs to the LLD for that particular Scsi_Host have either
> +    completed or failed. In other words, the only commands pending at the LLD
> +    for that host are the ones that need EH (host_busy == host_failed).
> +
> +    The idea is to quiesce the bus, so that EH thread can recover the devices,
> +    as it may require to reset different components in order to do its job.
> +
> +4.3 SCSI Error Handler thread
> +    -------------------------
> +
> +    scsi_error_handler()
> +    |
> +    +---> transportt->eh_strategy_handler() if exists, else...
> +    |     (Use transportt's own error recovery handler, if available)
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_unjam_host()
> +    |     (The SCSI ML error handler described below. Also described in
> +    |      Documentation/scsi/scsi_eh.txt. Basic goal is to do whatever
> +    |      needs to recover from the current error condition. And requeue the
> +    |      eligible commands after recovery)
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_restart_operations()
> +          (Restart the operations of the SCSI request queue)
> +          |
> +          +---> scsi_run_host_queues()
> +                |
> +                +---> scsi_run_queue()
> +                      |
> +                      +---> blk_run_queue()
> +
> +    scsi_unjam_host()
> +    -----------------
> +    The idea is to create 2 lists: work_q, done_q.
> +    Initially, work_q = <All EH scsi cmds>, done_q = NULL
> +    And then error handle all the requests in work_q by taking sequentially
> +    higher severity action items that may recover the cmnd or device. Keep
> +    moving the requests from work_q to done_q and in the end finish them all
> +    in one go rather than individually finishing them up.
> +
> +    scsi_unjam_host()
> +    |
> +    +--> Create 2 lists: work_q, done_q
> +    |    work_q = <All EH scsi cmds>, done_q = NULL
> +    |
> +    +--> scsi_eh_get_sense() - Are we done? if not...
> +    |   (For the commands that have CHECK_CONDITION, get sense_info)
> +    |    |
> +    |    +--> scsi_request_sense()
> +    |    |   (Use scsi_send_eh_cmnd() to send a "hijacked" REQ_SENSE cmnd)
> +    |    |
> +    |    +--> scsi_decide_disposition()
> +    |    |
> +    |    +--> Arrange to finish the scsi_cmnd if SUCCESS (by setting
> +    |         retries=allowed)
> +    |
> +    +--> scsi_eh_abort_cmds() - Are we done? If not...
> +    |   (Abort the commands that had timed out)
> +    |    |
> +    |    +--> scsi_try_to_abort_cmd()
> +    |    |    (Results in call to hostt->eh_abort_handler() which is responsible
> +    |    |     making the LLD and the HW forget about the scsi_cmnd)
> +    |    |
> +    |    +--> scsi_eh_test_devices()
> +    |         (Test if the device is responding now by sending appropriate EH
> +    |          commands (STU / TEST_UNIT_READY). Again, sending these EH
> +    |          commands involves highjacking the original scsi_cmnd, and later
> +    |          restoring the context)
> +    |
> +    +--> scsi_eh_ready_devs() - Are we done? if not...
> +    |   (Take increasing order of higher severity actions in order to recover)
> +    |    |
> +    |    +--> scsi_eh_bus_device_reset()
> +    |    |   (Reset the scsi_device. Results in call to
> +    |    |    hostt->eh_device_reset_handler())
> +    |    |
> +    |    +--> scsi_eh_target_reset()
> +    |    |   (Reset the scsi_target. Results in call to
> +    |    |    hostt->eh_target_reset_handler())
> +    |    |
> +    |    +--> scsi_eh_bus_reset()
> +    |    |   (Reset the scsi_device. Results in call to
> +    |    |    hostt->eh_bus_reset_handler())
> +    |    |
> +    |    +--> scsi_eh_host_reset()
> +    |    |   (Reset the Scsi_Host. Results in call to
> +    |    |    hostt->eh_host_reset_handler())
> +    |    |
> +    |    +--> If nothing has worked - scsi_eh_offline_sdevs()
> +    |         (The device is not recoverable, put it offline)
> +    |
> +    +--> scsi_eh_flush_done_q()
> +        (For all the EH commands on the done_q, either requeue them (via
> +         scsi_queue_insert()) if eligible, or finish them up to block layer
> +         (via scsi_finish_command())
> +
> +   Note 6:
> +      At each recovery stage we test if we are done (using
> +      scsi_eh_test_devices()), and take the next severity action only if needed.
> +
> +   Note 7:
> +      The error handler takes care that for multiple scsi_cmnds that can be
> +      recovered by resetting the same component (e.g. same scsi_device), the
> +      device is reset only once.
> +
> +5. SCSI Commands can be "hijacked"
> +   ===============================
> +
> +   As seen above, the EH thread may need to send some EH commands in order to
> +   check the health and responsiveness of the SCSI device:
> +   * TUR - Test Unit Ready
> +   * STU - Start / Stop Unit
> +   * REQUEST_SENSE - To get the Sense data in response to CHECK_CONDITION
> +
> +   However instead of allocating and setting up a new scsi_cmnd for such
> +   temporary purposes, the EH thread hijacks- the current scsi_cmnd that it is
> +   trying to recover, in order to send the EH commands. This whole process is
> +   done in scsi_send_eh_cmnd().
> +
> +   The scsi_send_eh_cmnd saves a context of the current command before hijacking
> +   it, replaces the scsi_done ptr with its own before dipatching it to the LLD,
> +   and restores the context later once it is done. The EH commands sent in this
> +   manner are subject to the same problems of timeouts / abort failures /
> +   completions - but they do not take the route taken by normal commands (i.e.
> +   don't take the scsi_softirq_done() or scsi_times_out() route). Every
> +   thing is handled within scsi_send_eh_cmnd(). This is discussed in following
> +   sections.
> +
> +6. SCSI Command Aborts
> +   ===================
> +
> +   It refers to the scenario where the SCSI mid level wants to have the LLD
> +   driver and the hardware below it forget everything about a scsi_cmnd that
> +   was given to the LLD earlier. The most common reason is that the LLD failed
> +   to respond in time.
> +
> +6.1 When would mid level try to abort a command?
> +    --------------------------------------------
> +    The SCSI ML may try to abort a scsi_cmnd in the following conditions:
> +
> +    1. SCSI mid layer times out on a command, and tried to abort it.
> +       scsi_times_out()
> +         -> scsi_abort_command()
> +        What happens if this abort fails? Schedule the command for EH.
> +
> +    2. The EH thread tried to abort all the pending commands while trying to
> +       unjam a host.
> +       scsi_unjam_host()
> +         -> scsi_eh_abort_cmds()
> +
> +       What happens if this abort fails? We move to higher severity recovery
> +       steps (start resetting HW components etc) because that is likely to cause
> +       both LLD and the HW forget aout those commands.
> +
> +    3. This is a nasty one. During error recovery, the EH thread may "hijack"
> +       a scsi_cmnd to send a EH command (TUR/STU/REQ_SENSE) to LLD using
> +       scsi_send_eh_cmnd(). If such a "hijacked" EH command times out, the SCSI
> +       EH thread will try to abort it.
> +       scsi_send_eh_cmnd()
> +         -> scsi_abort_eh_cmnd()
> +              -> scsi_try_to_abort_cmd()
> +
> +       What happens if this abort fails? Similar to the previous case, the
> +       scsi_abort_eh_cmnd() will try to take higher severity actions (reset bus
> +       etc) but will not send EH commands such as TUR etc again in order to
> +       verify if the devices started to respond.
> +
> +6.2 How SCSI command abort works?
> +    -----------------------------
> +    Unlike EH command like TUR, the ABORT is not a SCSI command that mid layer
> +    driver sends to LLD. The LLD provides an eh_abort_handler() function
> +    pointer that is used to abort the command. It is up to the LLD to do
> +    whatever is needed to abort the command. It may require to send some
> +    proprietary command to the HW, or fiddle some bits, or do whatever magic
> +    is necessary.
> +
> +6.3 Aborts can fail too
> +    --------------------
> +
> +    As with other things, abort attempts can also fail. The SCSI mid layer does
> +    the right thing in such situations as depicted in the section above.
> +
> +    Note 8:
> +       Once a block layer hands off a command to the SCSI subsystem, there is no
> +       way currently for the block layer to cancel / abort a request. This needs
> +       some work.
> +
> +7. SCSI command Retries
> +   ====================
> +
> +   The SCSI mid level maintains no queues for the SCSI commands it is processing
> +   (other than the EH command queue). Thus whenever the SCSI ML thinks it needs
> +   to retry a command, it requeues the request back to the corresponding request
> +   queue, so that the retries will be made "naturally" when the request function
> +   picks up the next request for processing.
> +
> +   When requing such requests back to the request queue, they are put at the
> +   head so that they go before the other (existing) requests in that request
> +   queue.
> +
> +7.1 When would mid level retry a command?
> +    -------------------------------------
> +
> +    Following are the conditions that will cause a SCSI command to be retried
> +    (by putting the blk request back at the request queue):
> +
> +    1. Mid layer times out on a scsi_cmnd, aborts it successfully, and requeues
> +       it.
> +       scsi_times_out()
> +         -> scsi_abort_command()
> +              -> schedules scmd_eh_abort_handler()
> +                   -> scsi_queue_insert()
> +                        -> blk_requeue_request()
> +
> +    2. EH thread, after recovering a host, requeues back all the scsi_cmnds that
> +       are eligible for a retry:
> +       scsi_error_handler()
> +         -> scsi_unjam_host()
> +              -> scsi_eh_flush_done_q()
> +                   -> scsi_queue_insert()
> +                        -> blk_requeue_request()
> +
> +    3. LLD completes the scsi_cmnd, and scsi_decide_disposition() looks at the
> +       scsi_cmnd->result and thinks it needs to be retried (For e.g. because the
> +       bus was busy).
> +       scsi_softirq_done()
> +         -> scsi_decide_disposition() returns NEEDS_RETRY
> +              -> scsi_queue_insert()
> +                   -> blk_requeue_request()
> +
> +    4. In the scsi_request_fn(), the SCSI ML finds out that the host is busy and
> +       the scsi_cmnd could not be sent to the LLD, hence it requeues the req
> +       back on the queue.
> +       scsi_request_fn()
> +         -> case note_ready:
> +              -> blk_requeue_request()
> +
> +    5. scsi_finish_command() that is called from a variety of places to finish
> +       off a request to the block level. However, it calls scsi_io_completion()
> +       that may look at the request and decide to retry it (if it qualifies).
> +       scsi_finish_command()
> +         -> scsi_io_completion()
> +              -> __scsi_queue_insert()
> +                   -> blk_requeue_request()
> +
> +    Note 9:
> +       The case 5 above has a very special case. There may be some cases where
> +       the scsi_io_completion() decides that a blk request has to be retried,
> +       however the scsi_cmnd for this req should be relased and instead a new
> +       scsi_cmnd should be allocated and used for this request at the next
> +       retry. This can be the case for e.g. if it sees an ILLEGAL REQUEST as a
> +       response to a READ10 command, and thinks that it may be because the
> +       device supports only READ6. Thus it may make sense to switch to READ6
> +       (hence a new scsi_cmnd) at the time of next retry.
> +
> +7.2 Eligibility criteria for Retry
> +    ------------------------------
> +
> +    Note that SCSI mid level always checks for retry eligibility before it goes
> +    ahead and requeues the command for retries. The eligibility criteria for a
> +    scsi_cmnd includes (some of these may not apply in all situations described
> +    above):
> +
> +    * retries < allowed (Num of retries should be less than allowed retries)
> +    * no more than host->eh_deadline jiffies spent in EH.
> +    * scsi_noretry_cmd() should return 0 for the command.
> +    * scsi_device must be online
> +    * req->timeout must not have expired
> +    * etc.
> +
> +8. Example: Following a scsi_cmnd
> +   ==============================
> +
> +8.1 High level view of path taken by example scsi_cmnd
> +    --------------------------------------------------
> +    We take the example of a block request that for example wants to read a
> +    block off a scsi disk, how ever the LBA address is out of range for the
> +    current device (hypothetically). The ML submits it to LLD, but the HW takes
> +    the command and chokes on it (again hypothetically to trace through the
> +    abort sequence). So the timeout happens and the ML aborts the
> +    command, and requeues it. In the next run, the LLD completes the command
> +    with CHECK_CONDITION.  We assume that the SCSI host does not automatically
> +    get the sense info. The ML schedules the cmnd for EH. The EH thread sends
> +    the REQUEST_SENSE to get sense info ILLEGAL_REQUEST, and based on it
> +    completes the request to the block layer.
> +
> +8.2 Actual Path taken
> +    -----------------
> +
> +    Dispatched:
> +
> +    scsi_request_fn()
> +    |
> +    +---> blk_peek_request()
> +    |     |
> +    |     +---> scsi_prep_fn()
> +    |           (Allocate and setup scsi_cmnd)
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_dispatch_cmd()
> +          |
> +          +---> hostt->queue_command()
> +
> +    Times out:
> +
> +    scsi_times_out()
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_abort_command() - returns SUCCESS
> +          |
> +          +---> queue_delayed_work(abort_work)
> +
> +    Abort Handler:
> +
> +    scmd_eh_abort_handler()
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_try_to_abort_cmd() - returns SUCCESS
> +    |     |
> +    |     +---> hostt->eh_abort_handler()
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_queue_insert()
> +          |
> +          +---> __scsi_queue_insert()
> +                |
> +                +---> blk_requeue_request()
> +                      (the req is requeued, with req->special pointing
> +                       to scsi_cmnd)
> +
> +    Request picked up again:
> +
> +    scsi_request_fn()
> +    |
> +    +---> blk_peek_request()
> +    |     (req->cmd_flags has REQ_DONTPREP set, so does not call
> +    |      scsi_prep_fn() again)
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_dispatch_cmd()
> +          |
> +          +---> hostt->queue_command()
> +
> +    Command is completed with a CHECK_CONDITION:
> +
> +    scsi_softirq_done()
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_decide_disposition()
> +    |     (Sees the CHECK_CONDITION)
> +    |     |
> +    |     +---> scsi_check_sense() - returns FAILED
> +    |           |
> +    |           +---> scsi_command_normalize_sense()
> +    |                 (Fails to find a valid sense data)
> +    |
> +    +---> case FAILED:
> +          |
> +          +---> scsi_eh_scmd_add()
> +                Add scsi_cmnd to the host EH queue
> +                |
> +                +---> scsi_eh_wakeup()
> +
> +    The SCSI Error handler thread runs to get the sense info, and completes the
> +    request once it is done.
> +
> +    scsi_error_handler()
> +    |
> +    +---> scsi_unjam_host()
> +          |
> +          +---> scsi_eh_get_sense()
> +          |     |
> +          |     +---> scsi_request_sense()
> +          |     |     |
> +          |     |     +---> scsi_send_eh_cmnd()
> +          |     |          (Highjacks the smnd to send EH command)
> +          |     |           |
> +          |     |           +--> scsi_eh_prep_cmnd()
> +          |     |           |    (save context of the existing scsi_cmndi,
> +          |     |           |    allocates a sense buffer, and sets up the
> +          |     |           |    scsi_cmnd for REQUEST_SENSE)
> +          |     |           |
> +          |     |           +--> hostt->queuecommand(), and then wait...
> +          |     |           |    (gets the sense data for the cmnd)
> +          |     |           |
> +          |     |           +--> scsi_eh_completed_normally() - returns SUCCESS
> +          |     |           |
> +          |     |           +--> scsi_eh_restore_cmnd()
> +          |     |                (restores the context of original scsi_cmnd)
> +          |     |
> +          |     +---> scsi_decide_disposition() - returns SUCCESS
> +          |     |      (This time can see the sense info)
> +          |     |
> +          |     +---> Set scmd->retries = scmd->allowed (to avoid retries)
> +          |     |
> +          |     +---> scsi_eh_finish_cmd()
> +          |           (Puts the scsi_cmnd on the done_q)
> +          |
> +          +---> scsi_eh_flush_done_q()
> +                (Sees that scsi_cmnd is not eligible for retries)
> +                |
> +                +---> scsi_finish_command()
> +                      |
> +                      +---> scsi_io_completion()
> +                            |
> +                            +---> scsi_end_request()
> +                                  |
> +                                  +---> scsi_put_command()
> +                                       (Releases the scsi_cmnd)
> +
> +9. References
> +   ==========
> +   The following are excellent sources of references:
> +   Documentation/scsi/scsi_eh.txt
> +   http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/SCSI-EH.pdf
> +--
> --
> 2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ