linux-kernel - Re: Uses of Linux backports in the industry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:49:57 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <weigelt@...ag.de>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
	"backports@...r.kernel.org" <backports@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: Uses of Linux backports in the industry

On Fri 2015-05-29 13:36:09, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:01:00PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
> > <weigelt@...ag.de> wrote:
> > > Am 29.05.2015 um 04:54 schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez:
> > > Actually, I really wonder why folks are sticking to ancient kernels on
> > > newer hardware.
> > 
> > Enterprise distribution kernels. Or "special" kernels like PREEMPT_RT.
> > Sometimes the vendor BSP is that horrid that a customer cannot afford
> > to forward port it
> > but wants recent stuff. So you need to backport...
> 
> Yep.  The technique I used for the backporting ext4 encryption into
> the 3.10 android-common git tree in AOSP was to drop in the 3.18
> versions of fs/ext4 and fs/jbd2 into the 3.10 tree (along with the
> associaed include files in include/linux and include/trace/events, of
> course), and then fix things up until they built correctly (using
> cherry-picks and in some cases, reverting some changes in the 3.18
> version of fs/ext4).  After I was sure the transplant of the 3.18
> version of ext4 had "taken" correctly, with no test regressions, only
> then did I cherry-pick all of the ext4 encryption changes on top of
> 3.10.
> 
> The backport of ext4 encryption to the 3.18 version of android-common
> should be much easier.  :-)   Unfortunately, I also have to do a
> backport to the 3.14 android-common branch as well.   <sigh>
> 
> Yes, it's ugly, but there still are some SOC and drivers that aren't
> available on newer kernels.  Basically, the handset vendors need to
> lean a lot harder on the SOC and other peripheral (cell radios, GPS,
> etc., etc.).  :-(

Actually, what we really want is chip vendors to clean up the
interfaces, and merge their changes upstream... Perhaps we'll be able
to install normal distros on cellphones one day...

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/