[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1435096765-31873-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:59:25 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@...com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] c67: irq: don't reimplement __handle_domain_irq()
c6x_do_IRQ() had a reimplementation of
__handle_domain_irq(), instead just call
that.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
---
Patch wasn't even compile tested because I really don't
have c6x GCC around. If someone could test the patch before
applying, that would avoid regressions.
arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c b/arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c
index 247e0eb5e467..a7f73bc765ac 100644
--- a/arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c
@@ -58,22 +58,13 @@ static struct irq_chip core_chip = {
};
static int prio_to_virq[NR_PRIORITY_IRQS];
+static struct irq_domain *core_domain;
asmlinkage void c6x_do_IRQ(unsigned int prio, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
-
- irq_enter();
-
- generic_handle_irq(prio_to_virq[prio]);
-
- irq_exit();
-
- set_irq_regs(old_regs);
+ __handle_domain_irq(core_domain, prio, true, regs);
}
-static struct irq_domain *core_domain;
-
static int core_domain_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
irq_hw_number_t hw)
{
--
2.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists