linux-kernel - staging patch not in staging tree (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: ft1000-usb: fixed table alignment)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:03:34 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:	Peter Karlsson <peter@...to.se>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	dan.carpenter@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: staging patch not in staging tree (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging:
 ft1000-usb: fixed table alignment)

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 07:06:49PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> > On 2015-06-22 06:29, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > which tree have you been using?
> > > Greg will have three staging tree, use staging-testing
> > 
> > I have used linux-next tree :/
> well, I am now confused why linux-next is not having this struct.
> at line 415 of drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c
> struct timeval tv; is there in staging-next. And today's linux-next
> has merged staging-next. Then how that struct timeval is not there in
> linux-next ?

I was doing a bisect to see why the files are differing in staging-next
and linux-next. And it turns out to be:
8b37bf430656 ("staging: ft1000: Replace timeval and time_t with time64_t")

which didn't go through the staging tree.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/