linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] EDAC updates for 4.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzYzQKy70UGJ7qQj_T9BqjaLPa57dv_-2db-XpGCys79w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:49:50 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EDAC updates for 4.2

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Important: Please merge this stuff *after* you have merged the tip pile
> because it depends on it.

What does this mean?

If it doesn't work or compile without the tip pile, then I'm not
pulling it at all, since that means that any problems are not
bisectable.

The patches are based on 4.1-rc1. If it doesn't work on top of that,
then that means that you clearly have tested *none* of this. Which
just makes me go "yeah, I'm not pulling untested crap".

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/