[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB4PR02MB272BDAD82918D4E3A526475D6A00@DB4PR02MB272.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:05:32 +0000
From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
To: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
CC: linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"vgupta@...opsys.com" <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@...hip.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
Tal Zilcer <talz@...hip.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] NET: Add ezchip ethernet driver
From: Mahesh Bandewar [mailto:maheshb@...gle.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 8:45 PM
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/Kconfig
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/Kconfig
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d031177
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/Kconfig
> > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> > +#
> > +# EZchip network device configuration #
> > +
> > +config NET_VENDOR_EZCHIP
> > + bool "EZchip devices"
> > + default y
> >
> Why this has to be included in the default build? Shouldn't it be either "m" or "N" by default?
From what I see this is the common practice for all Ethernet devices.
Noam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists