linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] IOMMU Updates for Linux v4.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150624070902.GA18569@8bytes.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:09:02 +0200
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] IOMMU Updates for Linux v4.2

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:47:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm. My resolution doesn't look the same at all, but that could easily
> be due to trivial differences. I tried to make as much sense of the
> merge as possible, so I think my merge is fine, but it's also entirely
> possible I screwed something up.

Your resolution looks good (there is only a missing newline after the
declarations in intel_free_irq_resources). The only other difference to
my resolution is that you kept the new set_irq_posting_cap() function at
the original location, I moved it to a different place in the file. But
these differences don't matter for functionality, so everything is fine :)


Thanks,

	Joerg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/