linux-kernel - Re: [Bugfix v2] PCI, ACPI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <558A698A.9000508@pr.hu>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:25:46 +0200
From:	Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@...hu>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, "x86 @ kernel . org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugfix v2] PCI, ACPI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t
 overflow with 32bit kernel

2015-06-24 09:43 keltezéssel, Jiang Liu írta:
> Since commit 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource
> interfaces to simplify implementation"), x86 PCI ACPI host bridge driver
> validates ACPI resources by first converting an ACPI resource to
> a 'struct resource' structure and then applying checks against the
> converted resource structure. The 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct
> resource' are defined to be type of resource_size_t, which may be 32 bits
> or 64 bits depending on CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT.
>
> This may cause incorrect resource validation results with 32 bit kernels
> because 64bit ACPI resource descriptors may get truncated when converting
> to 32bit 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource'. And eventually
> affects PCI resource allocation subsystem and causes some PCI devices
> unusable.
>
> So enhance the ACPI resource parsing interfaces to ignore ACPI resource
> descriptors with address/offset observe 4G when running in 32bit mode.
> This reverts to the behavior before commit 593669c2ac0f.
>
> This issue was triggered on a platform running 32bit kernel with an
> ACPI resource descriptor with address range [0x400000000-0xfffffffff].
> Please refer to https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/19/277 for more information.
>
> Reported-by: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@...hu>
> Fixes: 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation")
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.0
> ---
>
> Hi Zoltan,
> 	Could you please help to test this patch against the latest kernel?
> Thanks!
> Gerry

I will, thanks.

Best regards,
Zoltán

>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/resource.c |   24 +++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
> index 8244f013f210..f1c966e05078 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static bool acpi_decode_space(struct resource_win *win,
>  	u8 iodec = attr->granularity == 0xfff ? ACPI_DECODE_10 : ACPI_DECODE_16;
>  	bool wp = addr->info.mem.write_protect;
>  	u64 len = attr->address_length;
> +	u64 start, end, offset = 0;
>  	struct resource *res = &win->res;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -204,9 +205,6 @@ static bool acpi_decode_space(struct resource_win *win,
>  		pr_debug("ACPI: Invalid address space min_addr_fix %d, max_addr_fix %d, len %llx\n",
>  			 addr->min_address_fixed, addr->max_address_fixed, len);
>  
> -	res->start = attr->minimum;
> -	res->end = attr->maximum;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * For bridges that translate addresses across the bridge,
>  	 * translation_offset is the offset that must be added to the
> @@ -214,12 +212,22 @@ static bool acpi_decode_space(struct resource_win *win,
>  	 * primary side. Non-bridge devices must list 0 for all Address
>  	 * Translation offset bits.
>  	 */
> -	if (addr->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER) {
> -		res->start += attr->translation_offset;
> -		res->end += attr->translation_offset;
> -	} else if (attr->translation_offset) {
> +	if (addr->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER)
> +		offset = attr->translation_offset;
> +	else if (attr->translation_offset)
>  		pr_debug("ACPI: translation_offset(%lld) is invalid for non-bridge device.\n",
>  			 attr->translation_offset);
> +	start = attr->minimum + offset;
> +	end = attr->maximum + offset;
> +
> +	win->offset = offset;
> +	res->start = start;
> +	res->end = end;
> +	if (sizeof(resource_size_t) < sizeof(u64) &&
> +	    (offset != win->offset || start != res->start || end != res->end)) {
> +		pr_warn("acpi resource window ([%#llx-%#llx] ignored, not CPU addressable)\n",
> +			attr->minimum, attr->maximum);
> +		return false;
>  	}
>  
>  	switch (addr->resource_type) {
> @@ -236,8 +244,6 @@ static bool acpi_decode_space(struct resource_win *win,
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> -	win->offset = attr->translation_offset;
> -
>  	if (addr->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER)
>  		res->flags |= IORESOURCE_WINDOW;
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/