linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v6 2/2] nvmem: Add Vybrid OCOTP and OCROM support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150624083529.GY2266@lukather>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:35:29 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
	Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arnd@...db.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stefan@...er.ch,
	kernel@...gutronix.de, shawn.guo@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 2/2] nvmem: Add Vybrid OCOTP and OCROM support

Hi, 

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 07:14:57PM +0530, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> +static struct nvmem_config ocotp_config = {
> +	.name = "soc_id",
> +};
> +
> +static struct nvmem_config rom_config = {
> +	.name = "rom_rev",
> +};

Srinivas, shouldn't we use the DT to setup these names, just like
clock-output-names does for example?

This is very likely to change from one board to another, and defining
a new compatible and/or driver for each board seems a bit fishy.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)