[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150624085658.GF27188@linux>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:26:58 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@...aro.org>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: mediatek: Add MT8173 cpufreq driver
On 24-06-15, 16:44, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
> One reason to put those initialization and resource allocation in probe is
> that it's easier to handle the return value -PROBE_DEFER from clock
> and regulator framework when trying to get clocks and regulators
> consumed by cpufreq driver.
This is the sequence of events if you move these things to ->init().
- your driver's probe()
-> cpufreq_register_driver()
-> init()
-> clk/reg get, failed, return -EPROBE_DEFER
And the failure here will be propagated to probe(). So, it should
work IMHO.
> The other reason is when the whole system is resuming from suspend,
> the other subsystem e.g. i2c on which cpufreq driver depends might not
> ready yet during cpufreq driver initialization. In this case, the cpufreq
> driver will be blocked when trying to get resources e.g. regulator on i2c
> bus, and the whole system will stuck for seconds.
That's something else you must investigate on. This dependency should
be resolved in some other way, I thought DT might have taken care of
such dependencies.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists