[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150624133349.GI4156@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 06:33:50 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Use of pinctrl-single for external device over I2C
* Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org> [150624 05:06]:
> On Tuesday 23 June 2015 04:25 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >
> >/*
> > * REVISIT: Reads and writes could eventually use regmap or something
> > * generic. But at least on omaps, some mux registers are performance
> > * critical as they may need to be remuxed every time before and after
> > * idle. Adding tests for register access width for every read and
> > * write like regmap is doing is not desired, and caching the registers
> > * does not help in this case.
> > */
> >
> >
> >Should be not have flag for this and use regmap_ variants? If we
> >implement flag based approach then same driver can be reused for pinmux
> >configuration of external device.
Nothing stopping you from adding regmap support to it. It just needs
to be made optional as the users so far don't need it.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists