[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1435160348.12060.7.camel@bitron.ch>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:39:08 +0200
From: Jürg Billeter <j@...ron.ch>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gigi Joseph <gigi.joseph@...il.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ti-st: st_kim: fix nshutdown_gpio in
get_platform_data
On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 11:31 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 06/24/2015 06:24 AM, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > @@ -761,8 +762,14 @@ static struct ti_st_plat_data
> > *get_platform_data(struct device *dev)
> > dt_property = of_get_property(np, "dev_name", &len);
> > if (dt_property)
> > memcpy(&dt_pdata->dev_name, dt_property, len);
> > - of_property_read_u32(np, "nshutdown_gpio",
> > - &dt_pdata->nshutdown_gpio);
> > +
> > + gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "nshutdown_gpio", 0);
>
> NAK. This breaks existing dtbs, since the format is not the same.
Isn't the existing code completely broken as there is no predictable
GPIO numbering in general? There is also no documentation or use of
that device tree property in the kernel tree, as far as I can tell.
Do you have a suggestion how to fix this without breaking existing
dtbs? Do we need to introduce a second property and support both in the
driver?
Regards,
Jürg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists