| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:20:31 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: acpi: Rename of_node() and acpi_node() to to_of_node() and to_acpi_node()
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 01:45:00 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, June 22, 2015 10:38:53 PM Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> > Commit 8a0662d9 introduced of_node and acpi_node symbols in global namespace
> > but there were already ~63 of_node local variables or function parameters
> > (no single acpi_node though, but anyway).
> >
> > After debugging undefined but used of_node local varible (which turned out
> > to reference static function of_node() instead) it became clear that the names
> > for the functions are too short and too generic for global scope.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
>
> Putting the whole world into the To: field of your messages is not a good idea
> in general.
>
> I'm fine with this change, personally.
>
> Does anyone in the CC list have any objections?
No objections apparently.
OK, I've queued this one up for the next PM+ACPI pull request, thanks!
>
>
> > ---
> >
> > Compile-tested on x86_64 with ACPI and ARM with OF.
> >
> > drivers/base/property.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 2 +-
> > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 +-
> > include/linux/acpi.h | 4 ++--
> > include/linux/of.h | 4 ++--
> > 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> > index 1d0b116..dfd4de6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> > @@ -128,9 +128,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_property_present);
> > bool fwnode_property_present(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *propname)
> > {
> > if (is_of_node(fwnode))
> > - return of_property_read_bool(of_node(fwnode), propname);
> > + return of_property_read_bool(to_of_node(fwnode), propname);
> > else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
> > - return !acpi_dev_prop_get(acpi_node(fwnode), propname, NULL);
> > + return !acpi_dev_prop_get(to_acpi_node(fwnode), propname, NULL);
> >
> > return !!pset_prop_get(to_pset(fwnode), propname);
> > }
> > @@ -285,10 +285,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_property_read_string);
> > ({ \
> > int _ret_; \
> > if (is_of_node(_fwnode_)) \
> > - _ret_ = OF_DEV_PROP_READ_ARRAY(of_node(_fwnode_), _propname_, \
> > + _ret_ = OF_DEV_PROP_READ_ARRAY(to_of_node(_fwnode_), _propname_, \
> > _type_, _val_, _nval_); \
> > else if (is_acpi_node(_fwnode_)) \
> > - _ret_ = acpi_dev_prop_read(acpi_node(_fwnode_), _propname_, \
> > + _ret_ = acpi_dev_prop_read(to_acpi_node(_fwnode_), _propname_, \
> > _proptype_, _val_, _nval_); \
> > else \
> > _ret_ = pset_prop_read_array(to_pset(_fwnode_), _propname_, \
> > @@ -424,11 +424,11 @@ int fwnode_property_read_string_array(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > {
> > if (is_of_node(fwnode))
> > return val ?
> > - of_property_read_string_array(of_node(fwnode), propname,
> > - val, nval) :
> > - of_property_count_strings(of_node(fwnode), propname);
> > + of_property_read_string_array(to_of_node(fwnode),
> > + propname, val, nval) :
> > + of_property_count_strings(to_of_node(fwnode), propname);
> > else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
> > - return acpi_dev_prop_read(acpi_node(fwnode), propname,
> > + return acpi_dev_prop_read(to_acpi_node(fwnode), propname,
> > DEV_PROP_STRING, val, nval);
> >
> > return pset_prop_read_array(to_pset(fwnode), propname,
> > @@ -455,9 +455,9 @@ int fwnode_property_read_string(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > const char *propname, const char **val)
> > {
> > if (is_of_node(fwnode))
> > - return of_property_read_string(of_node(fwnode), propname, val);
> > + return of_property_read_string(to_of_node(fwnode), propname, val);
> > else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
> > - return acpi_dev_prop_read(acpi_node(fwnode), propname,
> > + return acpi_dev_prop_read(to_acpi_node(fwnode), propname,
> > DEV_PROP_STRING, val, 1);
> >
> > return -ENXIO;
> > @@ -475,13 +475,13 @@ struct fwnode_handle *device_get_next_child_node(struct device *dev,
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
> > struct device_node *node;
> >
> > - node = of_get_next_available_child(dev->of_node, of_node(child));
> > + node = of_get_next_available_child(dev->of_node, to_of_node(child));
> > if (node)
> > return &node->fwnode;
> > } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)) {
> > struct acpi_device *node;
> >
> > - node = acpi_get_next_child(dev, acpi_node(child));
> > + node = acpi_get_next_child(dev, to_acpi_node(child));
> > if (node)
> > return acpi_fwnode_handle(node);
> > }
> > @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_next_child_node);
> > void fwnode_handle_put(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > {
> > if (is_of_node(fwnode))
> > - of_node_put(of_node(fwnode));
> > + of_node_put(to_of_node(fwnode));
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_handle_put);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > index 6bc612b..5d8b2b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > @@ -2040,14 +2040,14 @@ struct gpio_desc *fwnode_get_named_gpiod(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
> > enum of_gpio_flags flags;
> >
> > - desc = of_get_named_gpiod_flags(of_node(fwnode), propname, 0,
> > + desc = of_get_named_gpiod_flags(to_of_node(fwnode), propname, 0,
> > &flags);
> > if (!IS_ERR(desc))
> > active_low = flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
> > } else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode)) {
> > struct acpi_gpio_info info;
> >
> > - desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(acpi_node(fwnode), propname, 0,
> > + desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(to_acpi_node(fwnode), propname, 0,
> > &info);
> > if (!IS_ERR(desc))
> > active_low = info.active_low;
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
> > index 15eb3f8..d2d54d6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
> > @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static struct gpio_leds_priv *gpio_leds_create(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto err;
> > }
> >
> > - np = of_node(child);
> > + np = to_of_node(child);
> >
> > if (fwnode_property_present(child, "label")) {
> > fwnode_property_read_string(child, "label", &led.name);
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > index 8de4fa9..1224be8 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static inline bool is_acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > return fwnode && fwnode->type == FWNODE_ACPI;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline struct acpi_device *acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +static inline struct acpi_device *to_acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > {
> > return is_acpi_node(fwnode) ?
> > container_of(fwnode, struct acpi_device, fwnode) : NULL;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > index e4da5e3..ec3c98e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static inline acpi_handle acpi_device_handle(struct acpi_device *adev)
> > return adev ? adev->handle : NULL;
> > }
> >
> > -#define ACPI_COMPANION(dev) acpi_node((dev)->fwnode)
> > +#define ACPI_COMPANION(dev) to_acpi_node((dev)->fwnode)
> > #define ACPI_COMPANION_SET(dev, adev) set_primary_fwnode(dev, (adev) ? \
> > acpi_fwnode_handle(adev) : NULL)
> > #define ACPI_HANDLE(dev) acpi_device_handle(ACPI_COMPANION(dev))
> > @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static inline bool is_acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline struct acpi_device *acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +static inline struct acpi_device *to_acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > {
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> > index b871ff9..f05fdce 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/of.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline bool is_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > return fwnode && fwnode->type == FWNODE_OF;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline struct device_node *of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +static inline struct device_node *to_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > {
> > return fwnode ? container_of(fwnode, struct device_node, fwnode) : NULL;
> > }
> > @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static inline bool is_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline struct device_node *of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +static inline struct device_node *to_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > {
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists