linux-kernel - [RFC v4 13/31] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:57:02 +0200
From:	Andreas Gruenbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC v4 13/31] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode

ACLs are considered equivalent to file modes if they only consist of owner@,
group@, and everyone@ entries, the owner@ permissions do not depend on whether
the owner is a member in the owning group, and no inheritance flags are set.
This test is used to avoid storing richacls if the acl can be computed from the
file permission bits.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
---
 fs/richacl_base.c       | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/richacl.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/richacl_base.c b/fs/richacl_base.c
index 5da092b..1ef3bf3 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_base.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_base.c
@@ -365,3 +365,98 @@ richacl_chmod(struct richacl *acl, mode_t mode)
 	return clone;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_chmod);
+
+/**
+ * richacl_equiv_mode  -  compute the mode equivalent of @acl
+ *
+ * An acl is considered equivalent to a file mode if it only consists of
+ * owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries and the owner@ permissions do not
+ * depend on whether the owner is a member in the owning group.
+ */
+int
+richacl_equiv_mode(const struct richacl *acl, mode_t *mode_p)
+{
+	mode_t mode = *mode_p;
+
+	/*
+	 * The RICHACE_DELETE_CHILD flag is meaningless for non-directories, so
+	 * we ignore it.
+	 */
+	unsigned int x = S_ISDIR(mode) ? 0 : RICHACE_DELETE_CHILD;
+	struct {
+		unsigned int allowed;
+		unsigned int defined;  /* allowed or denied */
+	} owner = {
+		.defined = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED | RICHACE_POSIX_OWNER_ALLOWED | x,
+	}, group = {
+		.defined = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED | x,
+	}, everyone = {
+		.defined = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED | x,
+	};
+	const struct richace *ace;
+
+	if (acl->a_flags & ~RICHACL_MASKED)
+		return -1;
+
+	richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
+		if (ace->e_flags & ~RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO)
+			return -1;
+
+		if (richace_is_owner(ace) || richace_is_everyone(ace)) {
+			x = ace->e_mask & ~owner.defined;
+			if (richace_is_allow(ace)) {
+				unsigned int group_denied = group.defined & ~group.allowed;
+
+				if (x & group_denied)
+					return -1;
+				owner.allowed |= x;
+			} else /* if (richace_is_deny(ace)) */ {
+				if (x & group.allowed)
+					return -1;
+			}
+			owner.defined |= x;
+
+			if (richace_is_everyone(ace)) {
+				x = ace->e_mask;
+				if (richace_is_allow(ace)) {
+					group.allowed |= x & ~group.defined;
+					everyone.allowed |= x & ~everyone.defined;
+				}
+				group.defined |= x;
+				everyone.defined |= x;
+			}
+		} else if (richace_is_group(ace)) {
+			x = ace->e_mask & ~group.defined;
+			if (richace_is_allow(ace))
+				group.allowed |= x;
+			group.defined |= x;
+		} else
+			return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (group.allowed & ~owner.defined)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED) {
+		owner.allowed = acl->a_owner_mask;
+		group.allowed &= acl->a_group_mask;
+		everyone.allowed = acl->a_other_mask;
+	}
+
+	mode = (mode & ~S_IRWXUGO) |
+	       (richacl_mask_to_mode(owner.allowed) << 6) |
+	       (richacl_mask_to_mode(group.allowed) << 3) |
+		richacl_mask_to_mode(everyone.allowed);
+
+	/* Mask flags we can ignore */
+	x = S_ISDIR(mode) ? 0 : RICHACE_DELETE_CHILD;
+
+	if (((richacl_mode_to_mask(mode >> 6) ^ owner.allowed)    & ~x) ||
+	    ((richacl_mode_to_mask(mode >> 3) ^ group.allowed)    & ~x) ||
+	    ((richacl_mode_to_mask(mode)      ^ everyone.allowed) & ~x))
+		return -1;
+
+	*mode_p = mode;
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_equiv_mode);
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h
index 1b66cd5..2357d6b 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl.h
@@ -307,6 +307,7 @@ extern unsigned int richacl_mode_to_mask(mode_t);
 extern unsigned int richacl_want_to_mask(unsigned int);
 extern void richacl_compute_max_masks(struct richacl *, kuid_t);
 extern struct richacl *richacl_chmod(struct richacl *, mode_t);
+extern int richacl_equiv_mode(const struct richacl *, mode_t *);
 
 /* richacl_inode.c */
 extern int richacl_permission(struct inode *, const struct richacl *, int);
-- 
2.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/