linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH-v3 1/3] mfd: 88pm800: Add device tree support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:57:16 +0530
From:	Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v3 1/3] mfd: 88pm800: Add device tree support



On Thursday 25 June 2015 05:27 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-06-24 18:21 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>:
>> Add DT support to the 88pm800 driver, along with compatible
>> field for it's sub-devices (rtc, onkey and regulator)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
>> index 841717a..059f01a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
>>   #include <linux/mfd/88pm80x.h>
>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>
>>   /* Interrupt Registers */
>>   #define PM800_INT_STATUS1              (0x05)
>> @@ -121,6 +122,11 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id pm80x_id_table[] = {
>>   };
>>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pm80x_id_table);
>>
>> +static const struct of_device_id pm80x_of_match_table[] = {
>> +       { .compatible = "marvell,88pm800", },
>> +       {},
>> +};
>> +
>>   static struct resource rtc_resources[] = {
>>          {
>>           .name = "88pm80x-rtc",
>> @@ -133,6 +139,7 @@ static struct resource rtc_resources[] = {
>>   static struct mfd_cell rtc_devs[] = {
>>          {
>>           .name = "88pm80x-rtc",
>> +        .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm80x-rtc",
>>           .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(rtc_resources),
>>           .resources = &rtc_resources[0],
>>           .id = -1,
>> @@ -151,6 +158,7 @@ static struct resource onkey_resources[] = {
>>   static const struct mfd_cell onkey_devs[] = {
>>          {
>>           .name = "88pm80x-onkey",
>> +        .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm80x-onkey",
>>           .num_resources = 1,
>>           .resources = &onkey_resources[0],
>>           .id = -1,
>> @@ -160,6 +168,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell onkey_devs[] = {
>>   static const struct mfd_cell regulator_devs[] = {
>>          {
>>           .name = "88pm80x-regulator",
>> +        .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm80x-regulator",
>>           .id = -1,
>>          },
>>   };
>> @@ -544,8 +553,23 @@ static int pm800_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>          int ret = 0;
>>          struct pm80x_chip *chip;
>>          struct pm80x_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
>> +       struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node;
>>          struct pm80x_subchip *subchip;
>>
>> +       if (!pdata && !np) {
>> +               dev_err(&client->dev,
>> +                       "pm80x requires platform data or of_node\n");
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if (!pdata) {
>> +               pdata = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +               if (!pdata) {
>> +                       dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to allocaate memory\n");
>
> Generic error message for ENOMEM is not needed. Just return ENOMEM and
> the core code will print the error.
>
> Rest looks fine,


Ok, will remove it.

Should I add your reviewed-by in V4 for this patch?

Thanks,
Vaibhav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/