linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.0 077/105] drm/i915: Dont skip request retirement if the active list is empty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87zj3oz1f6.fsf@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:34:37 +0300
From:	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.0 077/105] drm/i915: Dont skip request retirement if the active list is empty

On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:29:13AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > 4.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>> 
>> The commit to be backported is already reverted in upstream, and I just
>> got an email from you backporting the revert as well... would be best to
>> *not* backport either of these:
>> 
>> commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5
>> Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
>> Date:   Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300
>> 
>>     drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty
>> 
>> commit 245ec9d85696c3e539b23e210f248698b478379c
>> Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
>> Date:   Mon Jun 15 12:59:37 2015 +0300
>> 
>>     Revert "drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty"
>> 
>> I only marked the revert cc: stable because the original was too.
>
> This patch is now in 4.0 so what do I suggest I do?  Just take these as
> well?
>
> confused,

Sorry for confusing you. Please take neither or take both.

BR,
Jani.



-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/