| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:21:14 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> To: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com> Cc: abbotti@....co.uk, hsweeten@...ionengravers.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pankaj.m@...sung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging/comedi: remove unnecessary check around pci_dev_put On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 04:20:26PM +0530, Maninder Singh wrote: > pci_dev_put cehcks for NULL pointer itself, > reported by coccinelle > This patch is correct but the motivation is wrong. The check in pci_dev_put() is like a sanity check. There are many functions which have a sanity check and many which do not, it is impossible for a human to remember the complete list of each. When we remove explicit checks for NULL and instead rely on the sanity checks it sometimes makes the code more subtle and difficult to read. In this case, "pcidev" can never be NULL so the check is misleading and makes the code more complicated. Removing it is a good thing. Also the attach function does not have a NULL check so when we remove this check we make the code more consistent. But in other cases, if "pcidev" could be NULL then we should keep the check so that the code is easier to read. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists