[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558C0304.6050204@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:32:52 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM-kernel: Delete an unnecessary check before the function
call "unwind_table_del"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:05:21 +0200
The unwind_table_del() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
arch/arm/kernel/module.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/module.c b/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
index efdddcb..0cc1afa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
@@ -390,7 +390,6 @@ module_arch_cleanup(struct module *mod)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARM_SEC_MAX; i++)
- if (mod->arch.unwind[i])
- unwind_table_del(mod->arch.unwind[i]);
+ unwind_table_del(mod->arch.unwind[i]);
#endif
}
--
2.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists