linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 08/17] perf tools: Add Intel PT support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <558C03FD.4020600@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:37:01 +0300
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 08/17] perf tools: Add Intel PT support

On 23/06/15 18:15, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:29:34AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> On 23/06/15 02:00, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> [root@zoo ~]# rpm -q glibc-debuginfo
>>> glibc-debuginfo-2.20-8.fc21.x86_64
> 
>>> But then, it didn't even resolve the DSO, which it should, as I did manually :-/
> 
>>> Will continue investigating... Perhaps this is fixed in another patch? What I
>>> have test merged so far is at my tmp.perf/pt branch.
> 
>> I tried the same commands with perf tools from that branch (tmp.perf/pt) and
>> it seemed to work fine.
> 
>> One reason for not getting symbols is compiling perf tools without ELF support.
> 
> sure, but that is not the case here. But yeah, I'll try and triple check
> everything, next time will add the list of features detected to the
> problem report, so that you know which features were detected.

How is it going?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/