linux-kernel - [PATCH 02/19] x86/msr, kvm: Remove vget

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1435250653-30182-3-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2015 18:43:56 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/19] x86/msr, kvm: Remove vget_cycles()

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>

The only caller was KVM's read_tsc(). The only difference between
vget_cycles() and native_read_tsc() was that vget_cycles() returned
zero instead of crashing on TSC-less systems. KVM already checks
vclock_mode() before calling that function, so the extra check is
unnecessary. Also, KVM (host-side) requires the TSC to exist.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20615df14ae2eb713ea7a5f5123c1dc4c7ca993d.1434501121.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h | 13 -------------
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c         |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
index fd11128faf25..3da1cc1218ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
@@ -32,19 +32,6 @@ static inline cycles_t get_cycles(void)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static __always_inline cycles_t vget_cycles(void)
-{
-	/*
-	 * We only do VDSOs on TSC capable CPUs, so this shouldn't
-	 * access boot_cpu_data (which is not VDSO-safe):
-	 */
-#ifndef CONFIG_X86_TSC
-	if (!cpu_has_tsc)
-		return 0;
-#endif
-	return (cycles_t)native_read_tsc();
-}
-
 extern void tsc_init(void);
 extern void mark_tsc_unstable(char *reason);
 extern int unsynchronized_tsc(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 26eaeb522cab..c26faf408bce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@ static cycle_t read_tsc(void)
 	 * but no one has ever seen it happen.
 	 */
 	rdtsc_barrier();
-	ret = (cycle_t)vget_cycles();
+	ret = (cycle_t)native_read_tsc();
 
 	last = pvclock_gtod_data.clock.cycle_last;
 
-- 
2.3.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/