linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] zswap: dynamic pool creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALZtONAJogDgMJ45v6KLFbbe+SeDjfBFKDFv2VFC1zLJ8VGy7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:37:21 -0400
From:	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zswap: dynamic pool creation

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:22:07 -0400 Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org> wrote:
>
>> Andrew (or anyone else) do you have any objection to this patch?  I
>> assume Seth is on an extended vacation; maybe you could add this to
>> your mmotm?  If Seth prefers changes to it he still has a couple
>> months-ish until the next merge window.  I could then send the
>> follow-on patches, that allow zswap params to be set at runtime.  I
>> can resend them all as a series, if you prefer that.
>
> I'll take a look once the merge window mayhem settles down.  But it
> never hurts to do a refresh/retest/resend.

Sure, let me rebase the whole thing onto the latest upstream, and I'll
resend the series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/