[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6806026.xb91q6Ad7G@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:44:07 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
linux-fbdev <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Ville Syrjälä <syrjala@....fi>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] PCI: Add pci_iomap_wc() variants
On Thursday 25 June 2015 15:01:56 Casey Leedom wrote:
>
> Is there a reference I can read on this so I can understand
> when and where we can use the __raw_*() APIs? Can these
> Raw Read/Write operations be reordered with respect to
> each other or are the use of the various flavors of SYNC
> instructions just to maintain order between Cached Memory
> Accesses and I/O Instructions?
The interpretation is not consistent across architectures.
My best description would be that the __raw_*() accessors should
only be used for accessing RAM areas that are known to have no
side-effects and can be read in any size (8-bit to 64-bit wide),
any alignment, and do not have a specific endianess.
If you are dealing with MMIO registers that have a fixed endianess
and size, the correct accessor would be readl_relaxed(), which
is like readl() but lacks the barriers on certain architectures.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists