[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150625213443.GA129272@asylum.americas.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:34:43 -0500
From: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Scott Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steffen Persvold <sp@...ascale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: meminit: Finish initialisation of struct pages
before basic setup
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:48:55PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 05:50:28PM -0500, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> > My apologies for taking so long to get back to this.
> >
> > I think I did locate two potential sources of slowdown.
> > One is the set_cpus_allowed_ptr as I have noted previously.
> > However I only notice that on the very largest boxes.
> > I did cobble together a patch that seems to help.
> >
>
> If you are using kthread_create_on_node(), is it even necessary to call
> set_cpus_allowed_ptr() at all?
>
Yup kthread_create_on_node unconditionanly calls
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, cpu_all_mask);
It does it to avoid inherting kthreadd's properties.
Not being familiar with scheduling code I assumed I missed something.
However it sounds like it should respect the choice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists