[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150626000958.GB6633@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:09:58 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 08/17] perf tools: Add Intel PT support
Em Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 08:56:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Will do the same tests with intel_pt as well, on a remote machine, add examples
> to the changeset logs and everything going well, aim for pushing for Ingo soon,
So, I asked for callchains, with:
perf record -g -e intel_bts// ls
And it got stuck somewhere, then I did a perf top to see where it was,
and got to:
96.24% perf [.] intel_bts_process_queue
Annotating I get to:
1.17 │1a0:┌─→mov 0x8(%r13),%rdx
│ │ test %rdx,%rdx
98.83 │ └──je 1a0
Which is an endless loop! Source code for intel_bts_process_buffer(),
inlined there:
while (sz > sizeof(struct branch)) {
if (!branch->from && !branch->to)
continue;
err = intel_bts_synth_branch_sample(btsq, branch);
if (err)
break;
branch += 1;
sz -= sizeof(struct branch);
}
Can you fix this, please, so that I can fold it into where it was
introduced, namely:
commit 439ad895a2aecea09416206f023336297cc72efe
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Date: Fri May 29 16:33:39 2015 +0300
perf tools: Add Intel BTS support
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists