[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1435319912-4335-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:58:32 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: [PATCH] bdi: Remove "inline" keyword from exported I_BDEV() implementation
With gcc 3.4.6/4.1.2/4.2.4 (not with 4.4.7/4.6.4/4.8.4):
CC fs/block_dev.o
include/linux/fs.h:804: warning: ‘I_BDEV’ declared inline after being called
include/linux/fs.h:804: warning: previous declaration of ‘I_BDEV’ was here
Commit a212b105b07d75b4 ("bdi: make inode_to_bdi() inline") added a
caller of I_BDEV() in a header file, exposing the bogus "inline" on the
exported implementation.
Drop the "inline" keyword to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
---
fs/block_dev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index f04c873a7365c1b5..f839c339565e73af 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline struct bdev_inode *BDEV_I(struct inode *inode)
return container_of(inode, struct bdev_inode, vfs_inode);
}
-inline struct block_device *I_BDEV(struct inode *inode)
+struct block_device *I_BDEV(struct inode *inode)
{
return &BDEV_I(inode)->bdev;
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists