[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558D57FB.6090704@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:47:39 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 08/17] perf tools: Add Intel PT support
On 26/06/15 16:41, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Another thing, the intel_bts implementation does not support
>> "instructions" samples because there is no timing information to
>> use to create periodic samples. But callchains are added only
>> to "instructions" samples so there are no callchains in 'perf report'
>> for intel_bts. The call information is still available for
>
> Humm, so IOW, what you say is that we should refuse to run 'record' when
> asking for callchains and intel_bts?
'record' can record other events at the same time which can have callchains.
e.g.
perf record -g --per-thread -e intel_bts//u,branch-misses:u ls
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists