[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150626152952.GE9791@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:29:52 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"acme@...hat.com" <acme@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kristina Martsenko <Kristina.Martsenko@....com>,
Vladimir Nikulichev <nvs@...icks.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: don't adjust symbols in vDSO
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:18:59PM +0100, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> > (CC'ing Andy, since the removal of VDSO_PRELINK is user-visible here)
>
> What arch is this? I removed VDSO_PRELINK entirely from x86 a while
> back, and now x86's vdso has a base address of 0 before relocations,
> and everything works just fine.
I think this is only x86, since it's the removal of VDSO_PRELINK that
has changed things.
> (Except one ancient glibc, which fails if the vdso is relocated at
> all. We no longer support that version of glibc unless you turn off
> the vdso entirely.)
The problem is that perf expects to objdump portions of the vdso using
--start-address=foo and --stop-address=bar, but these addresses have changed
from being offset by VDSO_PRELINK to 0x0.
Thankfully, it looks like perf tool was always broken in this regard, but
I figured you might like to be aware of the issue. I guess perf just needs
to add on the load address of the vdso .text section to its relative
addresses before passing them to objdump.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists