linux-kernel - Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH 1/1] exofs: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "ore_put_io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <558D7433.6030304@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:48:03 +0200
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Boaz Harrosh <openosd@...il.com>,
	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...marydata.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Subject: Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH 1/1] exofs: Deletion of an unnecessary check
 before the function call "ore_put_io_state"

>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:05:19 +0100
>>
>> The ore_put_io_state() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
>> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> ---
>>  fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 3 +--
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c b/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c
>> index 84529b8..5dc7c4c 100644
>> --- a/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c
>> +++ b/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c
>> @@ -716,6 +716,5 @@ void _ore_free_raid_stuff(struct ore_io_state *ios)
>>  		if (ios->extra_part_alloc)
>>  			kfree(ios->per_dev[0].sglist);
>>  	}
>> -	if (ios->ios_read_4_write)
>> -		ore_put_io_state(ios->ios_read_4_write);
>> +	ore_put_io_state(ios->ios_read_4_write);
>>  }
>>
> 
> Thanks will submit for next Kernel

Is this small update suggestion still in the waiting queue
for further software improvements?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/