[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150626174756.GC5176@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:47:56 +0300
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@...el.com>,
linux-pwm <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Povilas Staniulis <wdmonster@...il.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
varkabhadram@...il.com,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
bloften80@...il.com, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Chih-Wei Huang <cwhuang@...roid-x86.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3 0/7] Crystalcove (CRC) PMIC based panel and pwm
control
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:31:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:32:03PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Next update of the series reviewed at
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/22/155
> >
> > Major changes are few review comments from Varka and Ville being addressed. Also except
> > for intel-gfx patches, all patches reviesion history is moved out of commit message.
> >
> > Hope this series finally finds its mark.
> >
> > Regards
> > Shobhit
> >
> > Shobhit Kumar (7):
> > gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table
> > mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO
> > signal
> > mfd: intel_soc_pmic_crc: Add PWM cell device for Crystalcove PMIC
> > mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: ADD PWM lookup table for CRC PMIC based PWM
> > pwm: crc: Add Crystalcove (CRC) PWM driver
> > drm/i915: Use the CRC gpio for panel enable/disable
> > drm/i915: Backlight control using CRC PMIC based PWM driver
>
> I think we have r-b/acks on all the patches now. Ok if I pull this in
> through drm-intel.git for 4.3? Or should I make a topic branch with tag
> and then send out pull requests to everyone? Or will each maintainer merge
> on their own since it's all only coupled at runtime anyway? Any of these
> would suit me.
I forgot to mention that I had a build failure due to
builtin_platform_driver() when I tried this (just changed it to
module_platform_driver() to get past it). So I'm not sure if this
now depends on some tree which isn't included in -nightly...
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists