linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: obdclass: fix macro coding style issue in uuid.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1435385089.9377.72.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 23:04:49 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Vasiliy Korchagin <vasiliy.korchagin@...il.com>
Cc:	oleg.drokin@...el.com, andreas.dilger@...el.com,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: obdclass: fix macro coding style issue
 in uuid.c

On Sat, 2015-06-27 at 06:36 +0100, Vasiliy Korchagin wrote:
> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl error:
> 
> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
> +#define CONSUME(val, ptr) (val) = consume(sizeof(val), (ptr))
> 
> by expanding it as this macro is used only once.
[]
> Notes:
>     Here is another version with macro expansion. Inline function expansion doesn't
>     seem like a good idea to me as it would make things overcomplicated.

It looks like it'd be simpler to use vsprintf extension %pU
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/uuid.c | 34 +--------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/uuid.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/uuid.c
index ff0a01b..b0b0157 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/uuid.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/uuid.c
@@ -43,40 +43,8 @@
 #include "../include/obd_support.h"
 #include "../include/obd_class.h"
 
-
-static inline __u32 consume(int nob, __u8 **ptr)
-{
-	__u32 value;
-
-	LASSERT(nob <= sizeof(value));
-
-	for (value = 0; nob > 0; --nob)
-		value = (value << 8) | *((*ptr)++);
-	return value;
-}
-
-#define CONSUME(val, ptr) (val) = consume(sizeof(val), (ptr))
-
-static void uuid_unpack(class_uuid_t in, __u16 *uu, int nr)
-{
-	__u8 *ptr = in;
-
-	LASSERT(nr * sizeof(*uu) == sizeof(class_uuid_t));
-
-	while (nr-- > 0)
-		CONSUME(uu[nr], &ptr);
-}
-
 void class_uuid_unparse(class_uuid_t uu, struct obd_uuid *out)
 {
-	/* uu as an array of __u16's */
-	__u16 uuid[sizeof(class_uuid_t) / sizeof(__u16)];
-
-	CLASSERT(ARRAY_SIZE(uuid) == 8);
-
-	uuid_unpack(uu, uuid, ARRAY_SIZE(uuid));
-	sprintf(out->uuid, "%04x%04x-%04x-%04x-%04x-%04x%04x%04x",
-		uuid[0], uuid[1], uuid[2], uuid[3],
-		uuid[4], uuid[5], uuid[6], uuid[7]);
+	sprintf(out->uuid, "%pU", uu);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(class_uuid_unparse);



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/