[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558EE641.7040404@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 20:06:57 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>,
Mattia Dongili <malattia@...ux.it>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: platform: x86: Deletion of checks before backlight_device_unregister()
> There is no way for a human being to remember the complete list of
> functions with sanity checks and which don't have sanity checks.
I understand also this software development challenge.
> Markus has introduced quite a few bugs as well
I have only found other opinions about specific update suggestions.
Which of such "bugs" are real mistakes?
Are you looking for a better consensus?
> (people have so far managed to catch his bugs before they were committed).
Would you like to refer to any concrete software developers?
> He so far has resisted any suggestion that he should manually review
> his patches before sending them.
I am performing source code review to some degree.
My approach does partly not fit to your expectations.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists