linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.0 19/22] kprobes/x86: Return correct length in __copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150627010854.756948159@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 18:09:01 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@...alab.ru>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.0 19/22] kprobes/x86: Return correct length in __copy_instruction()

4.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@...alab.ru>

commit c80e5c0c23ce2282476fdc64c4b5e3d3a40723fd upstream.

On x86-64, __copy_instruction() always returns 0 (error) if the
instruction uses %rip-relative addressing. This is because
kernel_insn_init() is called the second time for 'insn' instance
in such cases and sets all its fields to 0.

Because of this, trying to place a kprobe on such instruction
will fail, register_kprobe() will return -EINVAL.

This patch fixes the problem.

Signed-off-by: Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@...alab.ru>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150317100918.28349.94654.stgit@localhost.localdomain
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ int __copy_instruction(u8 *dest, u8 *src
 {
 	struct insn insn;
 	kprobe_opcode_t buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
+	int length;
 	unsigned long recovered_insn =
 		recover_probed_instruction(buf, (unsigned long)src);
 
@@ -361,16 +362,18 @@ int __copy_instruction(u8 *dest, u8 *src
 		return 0;
 	kernel_insn_init(&insn, (void *)recovered_insn, MAX_INSN_SIZE);
 	insn_get_length(&insn);
+	length = insn.length;
+
 	/* Another subsystem puts a breakpoint, failed to recover */
 	if (insn.opcode.bytes[0] == BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION)
 		return 0;
-	memcpy(dest, insn.kaddr, insn.length);
+	memcpy(dest, insn.kaddr, length);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	if (insn_rip_relative(&insn)) {
 		s64 newdisp;
 		u8 *disp;
-		kernel_insn_init(&insn, dest, insn.length);
+		kernel_insn_init(&insn, dest, length);
 		insn_get_displacement(&insn);
 		/*
 		 * The copied instruction uses the %rip-relative addressing
@@ -394,7 +397,7 @@ int __copy_instruction(u8 *dest, u8 *src
 		*(s32 *) disp = (s32) newdisp;
 	}
 #endif
-	return insn.length;
+	return length;
 }
 
 static int arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/