lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:00:20 +0200
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
	<ludovic.desroches@...el.com>, <leilei.zhao@...el.com>,
	<josh.wu@...el.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<pawel.moll@....com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2 1/4] ARM: at91/dt: add a new DT property
 to support FIFOs on Atmel USARTs

Le 11/06/2015 18:20, Cyrille Pitchen a écrit :
> This patch adds a new DT property, "atmel,fifo-size", to enable and set
> the maximum number of data the RX and TX FIFOs can store on FIFO capable
> USARTs.
> 
> Please be aware that the VERSION register can not be used to guess the
> size of FIFOs. Indeed, for a given hardware version, the USARTs can be
> integrated on Atmel SoCs with different FIFO sizes. Also the
> "atmel,fifo-size" property is optional as older USARTs don't embed FIFO at
> all.
> 
> Besides, the FIFO size can not be read or guessed from other registers:
> When designing the FIFO feature, no dedicated registers were added to
> store this size. Unsed spaces in the I/O register range are limited and
> better reserved for future usages. Instead, the FIFO size of each
> peripheral is documented in the programmer datasheet.
> 
> Finally, on a given SoC, there can be several instances of USART with
> different FIFO sizes. This explain why we'd rather use a dedicated DT
> property than use the "compatible" property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel-usart.txt | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel-usart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel-usart.txt
> index 90787aa..e6e6142 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel-usart.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel-usart.txt
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ Optional properties:
>  		memory peripheral interface and USART DMA channel ID, FIFO configuration.
>  		Refer to dma.txt and atmel-dma.txt for details.
>  	- dma-names: "rx" for RX channel, "tx" for TX channel.
> +- atmel,fifo-size: maximum number of data the RX and TX FIFOs can store for FIFO
> +  capable USARTs.
>  
>  <chip> compatible description:
>  - at91rm9200:  legacy USART support
> @@ -57,4 +59,5 @@ Example:
>  		dmas = <&dma0 2 0x3>,
>  		       <&dma0 2 0x204>;
>  		dma-names = "tx", "rx";
> +		atmel,fifo-size = <32>;
>  	};
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ